The challenge
Unequal rules for non‑human identities
The DORA RTS covers service accounts, technical users and AI agents in more places than many institutions assume. Only one obligation applies to employees alone, and that is exactly where audit discussions begin.
The challenge
Where unequal rules become a problem
-
Shared service accounts
An account used by three teams does not breach the unique user account requirement. That requirement only applies to employees.
-
No accountability
If the log cannot tell apart the actions of a shared account, the accountability required by Article 21(c) is missing.
-
No access reviews
Technical accounts are often left out of access reviews because they are not people. The regulation gives no grounds for this.
-
Not a legal term
Service account, technical user and non-human identity do not appear in the regulation. BAIT and VAIT, which covered technical users, no longer apply under DORA.
-
Impact
A gap in the wording
Obligations for technical accounts follow from articles written in general terms. In the audit, both sides argue over this wording.
- Shared accounts without a named owner
- Actions not traceable to a user
- Access remains after the purpose is gone
- Technical accounts missing from access reviews
- No answer when the auditor asks
-
Our approach
Same rules for every account
Every non-human identity is treated the way the regulation requires for all accounts. We close the one gap ourselves: a dedicated account, a named owner and access reviews on the same cycle as for employees.
- A dedicated account per non-human identity and per agent
- Owner under Article 21(e)(i)
- Lifecycle management for all accounts, automated where possible
- Access reviews annually, every six months for critical functions
- Logs with synchronized timestamps
Results
What the same rules for all accounts achieve
-
Clear legal basis
For every requirement on technical accounts, the provision in the DORA RTS is named. The auditor sees what each control is based on.
-
Traceable actions
Every action can be traced to an account and therefore to an owner, as Article 21(c) requires.
-
Reviews on schedule
Technical accounts go through the same access reviews as employee accounts, annually and every six months for critical functions.
-
End-to-end traceability
Synchronized timestamps under Article 12 make a chain of actions across several systems traceable.
Approach
From gap analysis to audit
-
01
Inventory
An inventory of all service accounts, technical users and AI agents with purpose, target systems and last use.
-
02
Map to the regulation
For each account type, we check which articles of the DORA RTS apply and where gaps exist today.
-
03
Split shared accounts
Shared accounts are split until every action can be traced to one account and one owner.
-
04
Link to access reviews
Technical accounts join the same review cycle as employee accounts, with revocation as soon as the purpose is gone.
-
05
Audit evidence
An overview per requirement with the provision and the control in place.
Ready for the next step
Talk to us about your technical accounts
Thank you for your inquiry.
Your message has been sent successfully. Our team will get back to you shortly.